Unpaid Medical Bills Admissible

In Qaadir v. Figueroa, the California Court of Appeal upheld a significant damages award in a personal injury case, despite objections from the defendants about the admissibility of unpaid medical bills and other evidentiary issues. The Court affirmed that unpaid medical bills were admissible under certain circumstances, that excluding testimony on attorney referrals did not prejudice the defendants, and that the trial court properly denied motions for mistrial and continuance.

Close-up of a black semi-truck cab driving on a highway, with several other trucks visible in the background. The trucks are aligned in a row, indicating heavy traffic or a convoy, on a slightly curved road under bright daylight.
DATE
August 2021
LOCATION
Los Angeles, CA
PRACTICE AREA
Auto Accident
RESULTS
$5,200,000

Overview

In Qaadir v. Figueroa, Malak Melvin Abdul Qaadir, the plaintiff, was awarded substantial economic and noneconomic damages after a traffic collision involving a truck driven by Ubaldo Figueroa, an employee of Pacifica Trucks LLC. Qaadir’s injuries necessitated extensive medical treatment, much of which was provided on a lien basis and remained unpaid at the time of trial. The defendants challenged the trial court’s decision to admit evidence of the full unpaid medical bills and raised other issues regarding the trial proceedings.

Results

The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s rulings. It found that, based on precedent, unpaid medical bills were admissible to establish the reasonable value of medical services and the plaintiff’s incurred economic loss, provided that expert testimony supports the billed amounts’ reasonableness. The court also determined that excluding testimony about Qaadir’s attorney referring him to lien providers did not result in prejudicial error, as the defendants were still able to challenge the credibility and motivations of the medical providers through other means. Additionally, the trial court’s decisions to deny the defendants’ motions for mistrial and a trial continuance due to the unavailability of a key defense expert were deemed proper.

Conclusion

The appellate court concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings and procedural decisions. The damages awarded were within a reasonable range based on the presented evidence and expert testimonies, and the trial proceedings were conducted fairly. The judgment in favor of Qaadir was affirmed, solidifying the legal standards for admitting unpaid medical bills as evidence and clarifying procedural expectations in personal injury litigation.

Two people shaking hands across a desk with a legal document, pen, and brass scales of justice, symbolizing a successful agreement or conclusion of a legal matter.

Get in touch

Speak with a lawyer today! Begin your free consultation.

Call Us
(310) 278-6666
Send Us An Email
info@californiaattorneygroup.com
Submission successful!
Thank you for your submission. A representative from California Attorney Group will contact you as soon as possible during our business hours.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting. Please try again or try calling (310) 278-6666.
California Attorney Group Google ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Google ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Facebook ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Facebook ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Instagram ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Instagram ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group LinkedIn ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group LinkedIn ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Yelp ProfileCalifornia Attorney Group Yelp Profile

Lawyer Advertising. This site provides general information and is not legal advice or a lawyer/client relationship. Results vary by case—please contact us to discuss your specific situation.