Impact of California’s Comparative Negligence Law on Injury Claims

In California, even if you’re partially at fault for an accident, you can still receive compensation under the state's comparative negligence law. But here's the catch: your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault. This article explores how comparative negligence works, how it can impact your injury claim, and why having a skilled attorney is essential for maximizing your settlement. For expert advice, contact California Attorney Group at (310) 278-6666.

Person in a white shirt holding a pen and reviewing documents on a desk.Close-up of an empty, vintage balance scale with two hanging bowls, set outdoors against a blurred background of trees and greenery.
PUBLISHED ON
October 23, 2024
CATEGORY
Auto Accidents
READ TIME
5 min

You’ve just been in an accident. You’re hurting, your car is wrecked, and the hospital bills are piling up. Then comes the kicker—you were speeding when the crash happened, or maybe you glanced at your phone for a split second. You weren’t entirely at fault, but you’re not innocent either. In California, this doesn’t mean you’re out of luck. Thanks to California’s comparative negligence law, even if you’re partially responsible, you can still recover damages. But there’s a catch—your payout takes a hit based on how much fault is assigned to you.

Let’s dig into how this works, how fault percentages affect your settlement, and why insurance companies love twisting this law to their advantage.

Understanding Comparative Negligence: The Basics

California follows a pure comparative negligence system. This means you can recover damages no matter how much you’re at fault—even if you’re 99% responsible. But here’s the deal: your compensation is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to you. So, if you’re awarded $100,000 in damages and are found to be 25% at fault, your payout is cut to $75,000. It’s simple math, but it can make or break your recovery.

What makes this different from other states? Some states follow a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which bars recovery if you’re more than 50% at fault. Not in California. Here, even a small fraction of fault allows you to still collect damages, though it reduces your total compensation. This means you need to understand exactly how fault is assigned—and how it impacts your claim.

Fault Percentages: The Real Money Game

Picture this: You’re driving along a highway, and out of nowhere, another car sideswipes you. But, here’s the twist—you were speeding. You’re hurt, your car’s totaled, and the medical bills are coming in hot. The insurance company decides you’re 20% at fault because of your speeding. Your damages add up to $200,000, but because you were partially responsible, your payout drops to $160,000.

But fault isn’t always clear-cut. Insurance companies love to assign you more blame than you deserve. They’ll argue you were distracted, or that you didn’t brake fast enough. Why? Because every percentage of fault they can stick on you means less money out of their pocket. Even shifting 5% more blame onto you can save them thousands.

So what’s the strategy here? Fight back. Every percentage point matters. This is where having an experienced attorney can make all the difference—they’ll build a case that minimizes your fault and maximizes your compensation.

Common Misconceptions About Comparative Negligence

One of the biggest myths out there? “If I’m at fault, I can’t recover any damages.” That’s just plain wrong in California. You can still recover compensation, even if the accident was partly your fault. The real question is: How much fault are you willing to accept?

Another misconception is that insurance companies are fair when assigning fault. In reality, they’re working against you. Insurance adjusters are trained to find ways to shift blame onto the victim, reducing their liability. This is why it’s critical to have legal representation that knows how to challenge fault assignments and ensure you aren’t unfairly penalized.

How Insurance Companies Play the Comparative Negligence Card

Let’s be real: insurance companies are not on your side. They will use California’s comparative negligence rule to reduce your payout, often by inflating your responsibility for the accident. They’ll dive deep into your driving history, social media, and any small error you may have made on the road. They’ll argue you were speeding, distracted, or slow to react.

And here’s the kicker—they’re good at it. Without a seasoned attorney in your corner, you could end up with more fault than you deserve, leaving you with a lower settlement. Don’t let them lowball you. An experienced attorney will push back, gather evidence, and minimize your fault percentage to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.

Why Legal Representation Matters: The Power of a Strong Case

Here’s the deal: proving liability is complex. Insurance companies will do everything they can to make sure you’re carrying as much of the blame as possible. A skilled lawyer knows how to fight back against these tactics. They’ll investigate the accident, gather key evidence (think witness statements, police reports, and expert testimony), and build a solid case to minimize your fault.

Think about it: The difference between being 20% at fault and 50% at fault could mean thousands of dollars in lost compensation. Having an attorney who understands the nuances of California’s comparative negligence law is crucial to getting every dollar you’re entitled to. They’ll fight for you—making sure that fault is distributed fairly and you get the compensation you need for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Real-World Example: Comparative Negligence in Action

Let’s say you’re in a multi-car accident on the I-405. It’s a mess—cars everywhere, injuries piling up. You were speeding, but another driver ran a red light, and a third was texting. The jury finds that you were 30% at fault, the red-light runner was 50% at fault, and the texter was 20% at fault. Your total damages? $500,000.

Under California’s comparative negligence rule, you’re still entitled to $350,000—the amount reduced by your 30% fault. In another state, you might have been barred from recovering anything. This is the beauty of California’s pure comparative negligence law—it allows accident victims to still recover damages, even when multiple parties share the blame.

Fight for Every Dollar You Deserve

California’s comparative negligence law can either work for you or against you—it all depends on how fault is assigned. The more fault the other party carries, the more compensation you can recover. But without the right legal team, you’re at the mercy of insurance companies that will twist the law to reduce your payout.

Don’t let them win. If you’ve been in an accident, call California Attorney Group at (310) 278-6666 today. We’ll fight to ensure your fault is minimized and your compensation is maximized—because in the end, every dollar counts.

Learn more about Auto Accidents Law